A study was carried out to determine pollution levels in soil and crop as a result of wastewater reuse for irrigation in Nairobi and establish the benefits and risks associated with this. Irrigation waters (raw sewage), soil and crop samples were collected from Kibera and Mailisaba wastewater irrigation farms during the dry and wet season. Irrigation water was analyzed for both physical and chemical parameters. Soil and crop samples were analyzed for heavy metals: lead, cadmium and chromium. Heavy metals in waters, soils and crops were determined by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) method. Crops sampled were maize, kales, black nightshade and arrowroots that represented grain, exotic leafy vegetable, indigenous leafy vegetable and root crop respectively. Samples for analysis were obtained from roots, stems, leaves and grains. Soils were sampled from plots containing maize and kales and black nightshade over depths of 0-30 em and 30-60 em. Household questionnaires were also administered to collect data on farmers' perspective on wastewater use for irrigation. The results showed that wastewater is reused in agriculture in many countries worldwide mostly because of inadequate water supply. Wastewater is also used because it has nutrients and is available all year round. Kibera and Mailisaba farmers however complained of some crops being adversely affected by the quality of the wastewater. Mailisaba farmers were more aware of the health risks than Kibera farmers with 7.7% of respondents at Kibera compared to 37.9% at Mailisaba Crop selection is one of the risk mitigation strategies in using wastewater for irrigation as most of the crops grown including kales, maize, amaranth, black nightshade, cowpeas, spinach, arrowroots, are cooked before consumption. Another mitigation strategy, as cited by farmers, is wearing of protective clothing. Nevertheless, many of the farmers confessed to not using any protective clothing. Most of the farmers produce crops for sale at the local markets with some of the produce being consumed at the household level. From the farmers' perspective, the main benefits of wastewater farming are: food security and nutrition (35.8% of the respondents); source of income (33.7%) and employment (15.1 %). In both sites, pH of the water was within the permissible range while Electrical Conductivity (EC) at Mailisaba was higher than the recommended level for irrigation. EC of Mailisaba irrigation water was in the range slight to moderate degree of restriction (0.7-3.0 mg/l), an indication that treatment would be required to avoid salinization of soils. Dry season average values for nitrates (N03) were 97.32 mg/l at Kibera and 126.46 mg!l at Mailisaba while wet season values were 16.45 mg/l and 25.38 mg/l respectively. The average nitrate values placed the wastewater at 'slight to moderate' (5-30 mg!l) restriction for both sites during the wet season and 'severe' (>30 mg/l) restriction during the dry season Given that farmers usually irrigate during the dry season, these results indicate that the wastewater may not be suitable for irrigation as it poses a threat to the environment. Farmers at both sites chose to grow leafy vegetables such as kales, spinach, black nightshade and cowpeas, which give high yields probably due to excessive nitrogen in the irrigation water. Lead and Cadmium in irrigation water were within the safe concentrations for crop production (<5.0 and <0.01 mg/l respectively). These metals pose no risk to crop growth. They may however pose a risk to human health if they accumulate in the soils to levels where they become bioavailable and accumulate in the edible parts of the crops. Chromium values exceeded the standards, indicating that extended use of wastewater for irrigation has the potential for accumulation of chromium in soils and could be a threat against public health. Farmers at both sites indicated that they would rather die a slow death from heavy metal toxicity than die today of starv